Legal Opinion
Stoltz Realty Co. v. Raphael
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided March 11, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
This is an action to recover a real estate broker’s fee allegedly owed the plaintiff, Stoltz Realty Co., by Benjamin and Helen Raphael due to the sale of certain commercial real estate owned by the Raphaels in Newark, Delaware. The Superior Court granted the Raphaels’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that Stoltz had previously arbitrated the issue with another real estate broker, the third-party defendant Alden Bugher Associates, Inc. Stoltz appeals from that decision and order of the Superior Court. Since Bugher had agreed to indemnify the Raphaels against any claim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Pettinaro Construction Co. v. Harry C. Partridge, Jr., & Sons, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
- Timmons v. CampbellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
- Hannigan v. Italo Petroleum Corp. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
- G. M. S. Realty Corp. v. Girard Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pvi, Inc., and William G. Skelly v. Ratiopharm Gmbh, a German CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Bresler v. Wilmington Trust Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Shore Builders, Inc. v. Dogwood, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Khan, PH.D. v. Delaware State UniversitySuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
- Maravilla-Diego v. MBM Construction II, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.