Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Downing

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Multnomah: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Action by Thomas J. Hammer against F. O. Downing and another, partners under the firm name of Downing, Hopkins & Co. ' Judgment for plaintiff. From an order, issued in supplementary proceedings, requiring the defendant Downing to apply certain money to the satisfaction of the judgment, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is a proceeding supplemental to an execution, to compel the satisfaction of a judgment. The plaintiff filed an affidavit, from which it appears that he secured a judgment against the defendants F. O. Downing and F. H. Hopkins, partners as Downing, Hopkins & Co., in the circuit court for Multnomah County, October 29, 1897, for the sum of $7,817.50 and his costs and disbursements; that an execution was issued thereon November 24, 1897, and delivered to the sheriff of said county, who in pursuance thereof demanded from the defendant Hopkins payment of the sum stated therein, or information…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hunt v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Maxson v. Ashland Iron WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State Ex Rel. Hewson v. HewsonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Weigar v. SteenOregon Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API