Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 17, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a petition for mandamus to compel the Auditor of Public Accounts to issue his warrant in favor of the petitioner for compensation claimed to be due bim under an act of the General Assembly approved March 24, 1924 (Acts 1924, page 460), amending and re*462enacting section 44 of the tax bill, relating to inheritance taxes.

Subsection 20 of section 44, which is to be construed, reads: “The expense of the execution of this act shall be paid by the Auditor of Public Accounts out of the funds collected hereunder, but the Auditor shall not', under the authority of this section, pay out of said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Love v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State ex rel. City of Seattle v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Tayloe v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. W. C. Patterson's Executors v. PattersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  5. Moore v. NationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bond v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Chick v. MacBainSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. Board of Supervisors v. CombsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  5. Kirk v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, MUSKOGEE CTY.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API