Morgan v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clark Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.
— The appellants, Sylvester Morgan and Sarah Morgan, his wife, were indicted for a violation of one of the provisions of section 2079, R. S. 1881, in having, for a period of time covering several weeks of the latter part of the year 1886, rented a room in the city of Jeffersonville to be used and occupied for gaming.
A jury found the appellants guilty as charged, assessing a fine of one hundred dollars against Sylvester Morgan and of ten dollars against Sarah Morgan, and, over exceptions, a judgment was awarded accordingly.
The first question made here is that the verdict was not *570sustained by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Graeter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Betts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Pierce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Reynolds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Ng Choy Fong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Voght v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.