Legal Opinion

Morgan v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1888No. 14,349PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

— The appellants, Sylvester Morgan and Sarah Morgan, his wife, were indicted for a violation of one of the provisions of section 2079, R. S. 1881, in having, for a period of time covering several weeks of the latter part of the year 1886, rented a room in the city of Jeffersonville to be used and occupied for gaming.

A jury found the appellants guilty as charged, assessing a fine of one hundred dollars against Sylvester Morgan and of ten dollars against Sarah Morgan, and, over exceptions, a judgment was awarded accordingly.

The first question made here is that the verdict was not *570sustained by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graeter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Betts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Pierce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Reynolds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Ng Choy Fong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  5. Voght v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API