Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Farias

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1933No. 9160PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

This action was brought by appellees, Far-ias and others, against appellants, Castillo and others, in the form of trespass to try title and for partition of the land in controversy. Appellants answered by cross-action, setting up limitation title to the land.

Upon 'a trial, in January, 1932, judgment was rendered in favor of appellees and against appellants upon their cross-action, and ordering partition of the land as prayed for by appellees. Neither party excepted to or appealed from this judgment, which thereupon became final, whereby all questions of .title were adjudicated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Cannon v. HemphillTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Cyphers v. BirdwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. McFarland v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Woodhead v. GoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rayson v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Sibert v. DevlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Azios v. SlotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Arouani v. BattisticCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Arouani v. BattisticCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API