Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tennent v. Leary

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1956No. 6229Published

1DissentUdall, Justice

I am firmly convinced the judgment of the trial court was erroneous and should be reversed. We have a peculiar situation presented by this record in that while the learned trial court gave no indication of the basis for entering judgment in favor of defendants, counsel for the latter predicate practically their whole argument in support thereof upon the proposition that the original offer of $17,000 by Tennent gave Kesicki an irrevocable option to accept same within two days, and gave Leary the same time in which to obtain Kesicki’s acceptance thereof. Appellees’ brief makes crystal clear…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weaver v. MartoriArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hughes v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  3. Woods v. National Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API