Legal Opinion

Geary v. McCreary

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 29, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

This action was instituted by the appellee McCreary against the appellant G-eary to- recover damages for personal injuries received while assisting as an employe in the operation of a drilling machine owned by Geary. *255Upon a' trial, lie was awarded damages in the sum of $10,000.00.

At the time the injuries complained of were received, Geary was endeavoring with his machine to lift out of an oil well that had been bored for oil several hundred feet of casing. The method employed was substantially this — a large pole, called a mast pole, was erected…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. Railroad v. Molloy's Admx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. WareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Haley's Administrator v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. A. Bentley & Sons Co. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Kelch's Administrator v. National Contract Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Lexington Roller Mills Co. v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API