Legal Opinion

Skouras v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 30, 1951No. 176, Docket 21787PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The question here is whether the donees’ power to destroy a joint assignment with right of survivorship gave the donor an exclusion from the gift tax. The Supreme Court has held that when unanimous action of the donees is necessary to such destruction then the interests of several donees are “future interests,” and the donor is not entitled to the exclusion under 26 U.S.C.A. § 1003(b). See Ryerson v. United States, 312 U.S. 405, 61 S.Ct. 656, 85 L.Ed. 917; United States v. Pelzer, 312 U.S. 399, 61 S.Ct. 659, 85 L.Ed. 913. The taxpayer contends 1 that unanimous consent was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Ryerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of McKelwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Degnan v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. of Perth, ScotlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Irwin S. Chanin v. The United States. Henry I. Chanin v. The United States. Sylvia Chanin v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Stephen F. Heringer, Mabel H. Heringer, John F. Heringer, and Alta G. Heringer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Hutchinson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  4. Hackl v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  5. Carson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API