Legal Opinion

Claim of Schmeling v. New Venture Gear

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMugglin, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 13, 2006, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related injury and denied her claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

In 2001, claimant filed a claim for workers’s compensation *1072benefits, alleging that years of psychological harassment at her workplace led to multiple stress-induced injuries. Subsequently, claimant was diagnosed as suffering from, among other things, schizo-affective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety disorder, paranoia, depression and posttraumatic stress syndrome. A Workers’ Compensation Law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Lumia v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Claim of Peterson v. Suffolk County Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Claim of Provenzano v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Claim of Curatolo v. Sofia Fabulous PizzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Young v. Pentax Precision Instrument Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Guan v. CPC Home Attendant Program, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API