Golden v. Golden

Appellee, as the party moving for a summary judgment in the trial court, did not demonstrate conclusively that there were no disputed issues of fact or law; therefore, summary judgment was inappropriate. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

We disagree with appellee that the facts presented in this case, between father and *261son, are the same as the facts considered by the trial court in Golden v. Golden, 434 So.2d 978 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review denied, 449 So.2d 264 (Fla.1984), an earlier action between the same father and his daughter. Specifically, there was no contention in the first…