Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Meltzer
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 22, 1923PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of contract to recover for painting the house of the defendant Belle Meltzer. There was evidence that the defendant Joseph Meltzer was engaged in the contracting business under the firm name of Joseph Meltzer and Company, and that he had on previous occasions, before the contract in question was made, engaged the plaintiff to do painting for him; that Joseph called on the plaintiff in June, 1920, and told him that he wanted him to do some painting on a house in Roxbury owned by his brother Samuel, husband of Belle Meltzer; that a price was agreed upon and the work was begun…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Linnehan v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Koplan v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Hosher-Platt Co. v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Dutton v. Amesbury National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Dyer v. SwiftMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Shay v. GagneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- White's Farm Dairy, Inc. v. De Laval Separator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- England Bros. v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Devlin v. NewfellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Peerless Petticoat Co. v. Colpak-Van Costume Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.