Legal Opinion

Cassaday 71417-509 v. Mendham

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 25, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00723Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ KEVIN CASSADAY, Petitioner, Case No. 1:22-cv-723 v. Honorable Jane M. Beckering BOB MENDHAM, Respondent. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a habeas corpus action brought by a federal pretrial detainee under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A court must promptly order an answer or grant the writ under § 2241, “unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” 28 U.S.C. § 2243. After undertaking the review required by § 2243, the Court concludes that the petition…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Atkins v. MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Witham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API