Joyner v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Quentin Lamar Joyner challenges his conviction for second-degree murder as charged. Appellant argues that the trial court’s use of the standard jury instruction for the lesser included offense of manslaughter by act constituted fundamental error and requires reversal of his conviction of the charged offense. He relies on State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla. 2010), approving Montgomery v. State, — So.3d-(Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
This case is distinguishable from State v. Moritgomery because Joyner was convicted as charged, rather than for one of the lesser included offenses.
In addition, the jury…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Garzon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Salonko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Croom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Riesel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- United States v. Carlos Mendoza-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Sims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.