Legal Opinion

Ashby v. Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2005No. 04-35394; D.C. No. CV-01-01446-AJBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Relying on its previous decision in Mark v. Valley Insurance Co., 275 F.Supp.2d 1307, 1317 (D.Or.2003), the district court held that, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, there can be no “increase in any charge” if the policy is an initial policy and the rate is *56the first rate charged to the consumer. It also held that no adverse action occurs if the insurance company renews a policy at the same rate it previously charged the consumer. In light of Edo v. GEICO Casualty Co., No. 04-35279, we overrule these…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mark v. Valley InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. Lilly, LLC v. Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API