Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Morris

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 8, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

Deceased made a general bequest to one charitable corporation and a residuary bequest to another. There is no expression in the will of preference for either legatee. The aggregate value of these legacies exceeded the statutory maximum defined in section 17 of Decedent Estate Law. Appropriate action *774to restrict the charities to the statutory limit was taken by a distributee. The question now here for decision is whether the common-law principle of abatement regulates the shares of the general and residuary charitable legatees in the total fund now held for them by the executors.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. In re Brooklyn Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. In re CraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. In re the Estate of KaufmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  5. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of Account of Proceedings of VisscherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of FosterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  2. In re the Estate of LotschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Sterling St. John & BoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API