Legal Opinion
Laiho v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 11, 1998No. Civ. A. 96-30158-MAPPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Count IV of its third party complaint is hereby ALLOWED, as specified by the Magistrate Judge. The clerk will set the case for a status conference. So ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket no. 23)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter relates to a complaint filed on August 29, 1996, by Plaintiff Robert Laiho (“Laiho”) against his employer, Defendant Consolidated…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Bruce W. KEATING, Sr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Pablo Escoboza VegaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carlson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000