Bawden v. Kuklinski
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
It was plaintiff's duty to look to see if he had room to turn; to give plainly visible signal of intention to turn; to wait until closely following car has passed. Court found defendant guilty of not giving signal of intention to pass plaintiff, though no evidence was given of his duty so to do. Plaintiff should have yielded right of way. Kenney v. King, 190 P. 834.
Occupants of defendant's car saw no signal. Negative proposition is as subject to proof as positive. Witnesses on each side, if equally honest and informed, are equally entitled to credence. 3 Jones Evidence (1896 ed.), 1982; 1…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bogk v. GassertSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Forrester v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Moore v. Rochester Weaver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1918
- Weck v. Reno Traction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. WatkinsNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Wright v. ClausenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Ratliff v. SadlierNevada Supreme Court · 1931