Legal Opinion
Peterson v. GIBRALTAR SAV. AND LOAN, INC.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided September 3, 1999No. 98-C-1601, 98-C-1609PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
751 So.2d 820 (1999)
Fred PETERSON
v.
GIBRALTAR SAVINGS AND LOAN, INC., The Galleria Investment Corporation, d/b/a Galleria One and/or The Galleria, et al.
Nos. 98-C-1601, 98-C-1609.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
September 3, 1999.
ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM.[*]
Rehearing granted in part; otherwise denied. The application for rehearing is granted solely on the issue of whether sanctions should be imposed on the Gibraltar defendants[1] and their attorneys for failure to timely disclose the existence of a ten million dollar ($10,000,000.00) excess insurance policy written by Reliance Insurance Company. To…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Peterson v. Gibraltar Sav. and LoanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oddo v. Asbestos Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- In Re Judge SassoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Muhammad v. Office of the District Attorney ex rel. Parish of St. JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- MUNAR v. State Farm Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Camille Landry v. Psa of Lafayette, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.