Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Bachen

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1999No. 19,882Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

{1} This interlocutory appeal arises from the trial court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to set aside an offer of judgment made pursuant to Rule 1-068 NMRA 1999. Plaintiff Daniel Fuller raises one issue on appeal: whether the trial court erred in granting Defendants’ motion to set aside the offer of judgment. In raising this issue, Plaintiff argues various grounds for affirmance, one of which is that Rule 1-060(B) NMRA 1999 does not apply to the setting aside of an offer of judgment when a judgment on that offer has not yet been entered. We disagree and hold that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pope v. Gap, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. McKee v. United Salt Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API