Ex Parte Stewart
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Sarah Hicks Stewart and Sarah Hicks Stewart, P.C. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Stewart"), petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to enter a summary judgment in favor of Stewart because, Stewart argues, the trial court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over a dispute involving the distribution of an attorney-fee award.
Facts and Procedural History
On September 11, 1996, members of a class who owned interests in oil wells filed a class action in the Escambia Circuit Court against several major oil companies who had purchased oil from the wells in which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Ex Parte Flint ConstructionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Ex Parte Inverness Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDaniel v. EzellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- W.A.A. v. Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- Carolyn Glenn v. Alisa J. Caldwell and Bonita J. Caldwell, as personal representatives of the Estate of Bonnie Quinton Caldwell, Jr., deceased; and Dorothy J. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026
- Leah Abbott Belser v. Blount County (Appeal from Blount Circuit Court: CV-22-900108).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2023