Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Stewart

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 2007No. 1060628PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sarah Hicks Stewart and Sarah Hicks Stewart, P.C. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Stewart"), petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to enter a summary judgment in favor of Stewart because, Stewart argues, the trial court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over a dispute involving the distribution of an attorney-fee award.

Facts and Procedural History

On September 11, 1996, members of a class who owned interests in oil wells filed a class action in the Escambia Circuit Court against several major oil companies who had purchased oil from the wells in which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow DriveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Ex Parte Flint ConstructionSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Ex Parte Inverness Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. EzellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  2. W.A.A. v. Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  3. McMillian v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  4. Carolyn Glenn v. Alisa J. Caldwell and Bonita J. Caldwell, as personal representatives of the Estate of Bonnie Quinton Caldwell, Jr., deceased; and Dorothy J. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026
  5. Leah Abbott Belser v. Blount County (Appeal from Blount Circuit Court: CV-22-900108).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API