McDonald v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Jurisdiction. The circuit court was of the opinion that because this action would involve interpretation of a collective-bargaining agreement between a railroad and a union the Congress, by the Railway Labor Act, had *209vested exclusive jurisdiction in the national railroad adjustment board.
The Railway Labor Act 1 classified railroad labor disputes into two large categories, labeled by the supreme court as “major” and “minor” and established separate procedures for handling each.2 Major disputes involve agreements not yet reached; i.e., negotiations for future contracts. They present the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. KoppalSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McDonald v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964