Legal Opinion

Kane v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 1996No. Civil Action 96-3630PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

KATZ, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 26th day of Aug., 1996, upon consideration of the United States’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Action, and the defendant’s response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the said motion is GRANTED.

The plaintiff, the executor of decedent J.A. Peter Strassburger’s estate, brought this suit for a partial refund of funds paid pursuant to the Federal Estate Tax. Complaint ¶ 1, 4, 5. Since the decedent’s death, plaintiff has paid $18,336,847 in federal estate taxes. Id. ¶ 5. Plaintiff contends that he has overpaid $2,637,967.00. Id. ¶ 14.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. CarltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John M. Quarty, Personal Representative of the Estate of Angele C. Quarty Elizabeth B. Cherne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. US Bank, N.A. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1999
  4. BROTHERS HOLDING LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  5. Edward F. Kane, Estate of J.A. Peter Strassburger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API