Legal Opinion

Starling v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 12, 1919No. 1369PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Accusation of misdemeanor. Before Judge Bigsby. City court of Cairo. February 26, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

Under the ruling made in Hendry v. State, 147 Ga. 260 (8), 264 (93 S. E. 413), “a question as to the constitutionality of a law can not be raised for the first time in a motion for new trial, where it was not made either by demurrer to the pleadings or by objections to evidence, or in some other appropriate way pending the trial.” The plaintiff in error in the instant case was accused and convicted of a misdemeanor. In his motion for new trial an attack is made for the first time upon the constitutionality of the statute for the violation of which he was convicted. Under the ruling quoted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hendry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wright v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Loomis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Savannah Electric Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Hudson v. DevlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API