People v. Salem
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
The defendant was informed against and convicted of a violation of Act No. 389, Pub. Acts 1919 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 15500 [1, 2]), otherwise known as the “pandering statute.” It appeared that the defendant was night clerk of a small hotel situate near the Grand Trunk railway station^ in the city of Detroit. He was a brother of the proprietor. One Sadie Stratton testified, in substance, that she and a girl companion rented a room at the hotel for $7 per week, and that subsequently she made an arrangement with defendant whereby she was permitted to entertain male companions in her room. It…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McDuff v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. KilroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. FeddersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. RayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. LaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.