Legal Opinion · Dissent

Radioear Corporation v. Crouse

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1976No. 11743Published

1DissentShepard, Justice

The ultimate decision reached by the majority opinion in this case compels my dissent. The relatively simple question presented in this case is whether a litigant who voluntarily pays and satisfies a judgment may thereafter have that judgment set aside and vacated. The majority holds in the affirmative and I disagree.

The generally accepted test for determining whether payment or compliance with a judgment cuts off the defeated party’s right to appeal or initiate other proceedings to attack the judgment is whether the performance is voluntary or involuntary. 39 A.L.R.2d 153-191, §§ 3.(b),…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Webb v. Crane Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Reserve Life Ins. Co., Dallas, Tex. v. FrankfatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Backman v. DouglasIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API