Legal Opinion
Abranko v. Vargas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 28, 2006PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 to modify the visitation provisions of the parties’ judgment of divorce, entered April 4, 2002, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Kelley, R.), dated January 14, 2005, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition for unsupervised visitation.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Supervised visitation with the subject children initially took place pursuant to the parties’ judgment of divorce and stipulation of settlement. It was agreed that the supervised visitation was to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Wilson v. McGlincheyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Carl J. B. v. Dorothy T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Grossman v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gooler v. GoolerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sinnott-Turner v. KolbaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Fallarino v. AyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Strand-O'Shea v. O'SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Fishburne v. TeelucksinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.