Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ephrata Area School District v. County of Lancaster

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 2005Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Senior Judge KELLEY.

I respectfully dissent.

It is well settled that, in the case of an easement by express grant, the rights and liabilities of the parties are determined by the terms of the agreement and each has the right to insist that the terms of the agreement are complied with so that, as long as the easement is enjoyed, it will remain substantially the same as it was at the time that the right accrued. Minard Run Oil Company v. Pennzoil Company, 419 Pa. 334, 214 A.2d 234 (1965) (quoting Piro v. Shipley, 211 Pa. 36, 60 A. 325 (1905)). When reviewing an express…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lease v. DollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Piro v. ShipleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Minard Run Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Fedorko Properties, Inc. v. C.F. Zurn & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Redwood Construction Corp. v. DoornboschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API