Legal Opinion

Gresham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1924No. 15217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

It is contended that the court erred in charging the jury as follows: “The burden is on the State to show,tand to show beyond a reasonable doubt, each and every material allegation that is set up in the bill of indictment, and the material allegations which the State must thus prove are these: that Eric Gresham and Irb Ison (they being jointly indicted), who must be identified as the defendants here on trial, on or about the 29th day of March, 1923, unlawfully did distil, manufacture, or make alcoholic liquors, or *780•spirituous liquors.” Movant contends that the jury, under this charge, were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newsom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Newsom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API