Bank of Honolulu v. Davids
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HEEN, J.
Intervenors-appellants Kevin Cacho and Hui 500 1 (hereafter collectively Cacho) appeal from the lower court’s orders denying Cacho’s motions for relief from execution and “To Alter Judgment on Intervenors’ Motion For Relief From Execution.” We affirm.
Bank of Honolulu commenced this action against Pamela B. Davids (hereafter Pamela), her former husband Daniel D. Davids II (hereafter Daniel), and American Flying Co., Inc., a Hawaii corporation (hereafter American Flying), to recover on a promissory note in its favor. Pamela answered and cross-claimed against…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Philko Aviation, Inc. v. ShacketSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Orso v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Stahl v. BalsaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Madden v. MaddenHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
- Matter of Estate of LorenzoHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mullane v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Shimabuku v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Nakato v. MacHargHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
- Johnson v. Tomlinson (In Re Tomlinson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Lewistown Propane Co. v. FordMontana Supreme Court · 2002