In Re Babcock
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
It appears from the record before us that the executor under the last will and testament of Mrs. Babcock employed counsel to represent the estate in litigation then pending in the court of chancery and which, if successful, would have resulted in the absorption of the entire estate. The matter involved was appealed to this court. The decree in chancery was affirmed.
Counsel, so employed, gave notice that he would apply for a counsel fee on the settlement of the executor's final account in the orphans court. An allowance was made. The executor had a perfect right to employ counsel, when…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kingsland v. ScudderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1882
- In re the Account of WolfeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re MegargeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1934
- Steger v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- In Re ArchdeaconNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1944
- In re the Estate of FosterBergen County Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Final Account of the of the Estate of ReadBergen County Surrogate's Court · 1946