Legal Opinion

Turchyn v. Nakonachny

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 2004No. 83557PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael J. Corrigan, Administrative Judge.

{¶ 1} William Turchyn and Maria Turchyn (collectively, “appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment granting appellees’ 1 joint motion to dismiss appellants’ amended complaint for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

{¶ 2} The gravamen of appellants’ lengthy amended complaint is twofold. First, appellants allege that, as parishioners of St. Vladimir’s Ukrainian Orthodox Church (“St. Vladimir’s”), they were harmed when their diocese, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the United States of America (interchangeably…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Universal Coach, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Tibbs v. KendrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Shariff v. RahmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Plishka v. SkurlaOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Turchyn Et Ux. v. NakonachnySupreme Court of the United States · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API