Legal Opinion
Reilly Ex Rel. Pluemacher v. Ceridian Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 12, 2011No. 11-1738PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
Kathy Reilly and Patricia Pluemacher, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, which granted Ceridian Corporation’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing, and alternatively, failure to state a claim. Appellants contend that (1) they have standing to bring their claims in federal court, and (2) they stated a claim that adequately alleged cognizable damage, injury, and ascertainable loss. We hold that Appellants lack standing and do not reach…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Carol AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- In Re Horizon Healthcare Services Inc. Data Breach LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Katz v. Pershing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Galaria v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Jennifer Clemens v. Execupharm IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.