Legal Opinion
Platt v. Bright
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Bill to foreclose. ■ On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The question presented for decision is the same which was presented under other circumstances at an earlier stage *82of the cause, and on which an opinion was then at least intimated. Platt v. Bright, 2 Stew. 128. The suit is for foreclosure and sale of mortgaged premises. The bill was filed December 17th, 1872. After it was filed, part of the property was taken under proceedings for condemnation begun February 3d, 1873, by the Eew Egypt and Farmingdale Railroad Company. The report of the commissioners was made March 17th in that year. The award was in favor of Mr. and Mrs.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McCulloch v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Astor v. HoytCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
- In re JohnNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Watson v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Astor v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- In Re Falk Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- County Park, C., Camden County v. BiglerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938