Michael Rose Productions v. Loew's Incorporated
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
This motion by defendants, so far as it seeks summary judgment, raises two questions:(1) Does the evidence submitted by plaintiff to explain and avoid its general release, which is pleaded as a defense by defendants to the present action, raise any genuine issue of fact?(2) If there is no question as to the binding effect of the release, which had been executed in favor of two of the present defendants, does it inure to the benefit of the six other defendants in this antitrust conspiracy case, under the doctrine that the unconditional release of one joint tortfeasor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- California Apparel Creators v. Wieder of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- De Luca v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Capital Imaging Associates, P.C. v. Mohawk Valley Medical Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Taxin v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.