Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Van Etten

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 13, 1999No. 96-0270-D-1; CA A98876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Husband appeals and wife cross-appeals from a dissolution of marriage judgment. On appeal, husband challenges the duration and amount of the trial court’s award of spousal support and the amount of the child support award. On cross-appeal, wife also challenges the award of spousal support, arguing that its duration should be indefinite. We review de novo, ORS 107.405, ORS 19.415(3), and affirm the trial court’s spousal support award without further discussion. We also conclude that, based on the limited appellate record before us, husband has failed to establish that the child support…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of Van EttenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. STATE EX REL. DHR v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. In re the Marriage of BleilerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API