State v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, Commissioner.
On this appeal Willie Thomas Armstrong, convicted by a jury and sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment for stealing $50.-00 or over, to wit, a motor vehicle, seeks a reversal of the judgment of conviction on two grounds.
First, he questions the sufficiency of the evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he stole the automobile in question by appropriating or exercising dominion over the property, or that he intended to permanently deprive the owner of the use thereof and convert it to his own use.
There is no question about the sufficiency of the evidence to establish…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. McClanahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MullenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. AbbottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. DrakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. NewhartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. CarmackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.