Legal Opinion

Foote v. Massachusetts Ben. Ass'n of Boston

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

Decided June 13, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law. On motion to vacate certain orders.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

This action is brought upon a policy of life insurance. The requisite diversity of citizenship to confer jurisdiction of the controversy upon this court exists between the parties: the plaintiff being a citizen of this state, and the defendant a corporation of Massachusetts. The action was commenced by the service of a summons upon the agent of the defendant designated to receive service of process within this state, pursuant to the provisions of the state laws requiring foreign insurance companies doing business hero to designate such an agent. Before the time for answering expired, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Jones v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Kelsey v. Pennsylvania R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fosha v. Western Union Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Vitti v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API