Legal Opinion
Galerie v. M & T BANK CORP.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 14, 1998No. 1:98-cv-01146Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER
MCAVOY, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants M & T Bank Corporation, Christopher DiPietro, and Donna Nowak’s (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) motion to disqualify the Law Offices of Andrew F. Capoccia, LLC from representing the plaintiffs in this action on the ground that Andrew Capoccia (“Capoccia”) is a necessary witness for plaintiffs claim of intentional or tortious interference with contractual relations. Plaintiffs failed to timely file papers in opposition to Defendants’ motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant M & T Bank, N.A. 1 (“M & T”)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cynthia J. Fisher, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Vassar College, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- George Lamborn, Henry Maringer, and Lamar Commodities, a Partnership v. Thomas H. Dittmer and Dittmer International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Finley v. GiacobbeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- MacArthur v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.