Legal Opinion

Haffner & Taylor v. Perloff

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 29, 1932No. 29531PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neidb, C. J.

This is a suit for a balance due on a contract for the construction of a building, and for extra work done on the building and on • another building on the premises. The balance due on the contract price was $1,300.07 and the amount claimed for extra work on both buildings was $1,612.87. The defendant, answering the suit, claimed that the balance of $1,300.07, which would otherwise be duo under the contract, was offset By $1,300 for liquidated damages, for 26 days’ delay in the completion of the work, at $50 per day, as stipulated in the contract. He denied that the items sued for as extra…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Godchaux v. HydeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Herman Bros. v. TroxlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Davis v. GlennSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  4. Allen v. WillsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Construction Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  2. Gulotta v. SwinneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Binnings Construction Co. v. Louisiana Life Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. C. Graham Pembroke, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross v. Gulf Oil Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Du Page Bank & Trust Co. v. Du Page Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API