Legal Opinion

People v. Tidd

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 2024No. A167548Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/29/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, A167548 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. Nos. CRI21008732, RAYMOND TIDD, SCN234453) Defendant and Appellant. When a party seeks to introduce expert testimony, the trial court acts as a “ ‘gatekeeper’ ” to exclude testimony that lacks a reasonable basis. (Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California (2012)

55 Cal.4th 747, 753, 770

(Sargon).) The question before us is whether the trial court adequately…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API