Legal Opinion

Cornelius v. Austin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 13, 1989No. 86-1496PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

The opinion previously issued in this case is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor.

Martha and Timothy Cornelius appeal from a partial summary judgment in favor of the defendants in their action based upon allegations of fraud and breach of contract. The summary judgment was made final pursuant to Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P. The Corneliuses' contract claims are not at issue in this appeal, because the summary judgment disposed only of their tort claims. We affirm.

In September 1985, Douglas and Virginia Austin listed their house for sale with First…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Torres v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Munroe v. PritchettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  5. Ray v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hines v. Riverside Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. McGowan v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Dodd v. Nelda Stephenson Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Fisher v. Comer Plantation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Interstate Truck Leasing v. BenderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API