Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Piccadilly Cafeteria, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 2001No. 2000 CA 1666PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JgPHILIP C. CIACCIO, Judge Pro Tem.
This appeal arises from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant, Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. (“Piccadilly”), for damages sustained by plaintiff in this food product case.
FACTS
On October 24, 1996, plaintiff Charlotte Anderson ordered the “Super Dilly” at Piccadilly in the Westmoreland Shopping Center in Baton Rouge. Ms. Anderson testified that after a few bites of the fruit salad, she noticed that it was not as good as usual. Nevertheless, busily engaged in conversation with her lunch companion, she continued eating. According to Ms. Anderson,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Porteous v. St. Ann's Cafe & DeliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Prejean v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Deleo v. Bayou LaFourche Fresh Water Dist.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Verrett v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016