Legal Opinion
Hirschfeld v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 26, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-549PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KAUFFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Sharon A. Hirschfeld (“Hirschfeld”), brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(3)(3), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant Kenneth S. Apfel (the “Commissioner”), denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433. Both Hirschfeld and the Commissioner have filed motions for summary judgment. The Court designated Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapo-port to submit proposed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Irelan v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- HARMAN v. BERRYHILLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Welker v. SaulDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021