Legal Opinion

Groves v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 21, 2018No. 2146/17Published

1Opinion of the Court

Groves v. State, No. 2146 of the 2017 Term, Opinion by Moylan J. THE PROTECTIVE SWEEP INCIDENT TO ARREST: A HOMEGROWN PRODUCT – A. A NATIONAL PHENOMENON WITH A LOCAL PROVENANCE – B. THE PROTECTIVE SWEEP AS A “PRIOR VALID INTRUSION” – C. THE MEASURE OF CERTAINTY – D. THE MEASURE OF JUSTIFICATION IS REASONABLE SUSPICION – E. THE PURPOSE OF A SWEEP IS OFFICER PROTECTION – F. THE DEFINITION OF A PROTECTIVE SWEEP – G. THE GEOGRAPHY OF A PROTECTIVE SWEEP – H. THE SCOPE LIMITATIONS OF A PROTECTIVE SWEEP – I. REASONABLE SUSPICION IS OBJECTIVELY ASSESSED – J. THE TRIGGERING JUSTIFICATION NEED NOT END…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API