Keeling & Co. v. Roose

Appellant was engaged in the business of an automotive advertising agency preparing *371advertising program material for companies related to the automobile industry. Appellee’s decedent, Ernest R. Roose, (her husband), was employed by appellant and the evidence reflects that he was variously described and referred to as “Vice President,” “Director,” “Technical Art Director,” “Contact Man,” “Sales Technician,” and as one of appellant’s “Key Personnel.”

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether there was competent evidence of probative value to sustain the finding of four members of the…