Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harry H. Winer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1956No. 12453_1Published

1DissentMiller, Circuit Judge

I am of the opinion that the goods in question were not stolen from railroad cars which were parts of interstate shipments of freight, in that at the time of the thefts the cars had arrived at their destination and had been delivered to and accepted by the consignee. O’Kelley v. United States, 8 Cir., 116 F.2d 966.

In this case the physical transportation as called for by the bills of lading had been completely performed. The consignee had notice of arrival and had the cars placed on its storage tracks. The delay in unloading the cars was for the convenience of the consignee. It is a well…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . General El. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. O'KELLEY v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  3. General American Transp. Corp. v. Indiana Harbor Belt R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Brunson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API