Legal Opinion
Mlinar v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 4, 2013No. 4D12-1332PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing, Rehearing En Banc, and Certification to the Florida Supreme Court
TAYLOR, J.
Appellant has moved for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and certification of conflict. We deny the motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc, but grant the motion for certification of conflict. We withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following opinion in its place.
Ivana Vidovic Mlinar appeals a final order dismissing all of her claims against UPS on the ground that the claims were preempted by the Carmack Amendment. We affirm.
Factual Background
Appellant is an artist who created two…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,067 Tex Morris Cindy Sagrera Morris v. Covan World Wide Moving, Incorporated Coleman American Moving Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Certain Underwriters at Interest at Lloyds of London v. United Parcel Service of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Ivana Vidovic Mlinar v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016