Gichanov v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Joseph Gichanov and Mary Gichanov. Judgment of conviction, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs- in error were indicted and convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, for selling intoxicating liquor fit for beverage purposes, containing more than one-half of 1 per cent, of alcohol by volume, in violation of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 307).
It is insisted on behalf of the plaintiffs in error that the trial court erred in admitting in evidence a bottle, claimed to be the bottle which contained the whisky unlawfully sold, for the reason that it was shown to have been in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Pickett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Luckhurst v. SchroederMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Remley v. I. C. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metcalf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971