United States v. Bank of United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
My decision in this ease is that a judgment must be entered dismissing the complaint without costs.
I. The case was tried on a stipulation of facts, amplified by the admission of certain exhibits which were put in without objection, and some slight oral evidence, which I do not consider of special materiality owing to the point of view about the ease which has formed itself in my mind after reading the stipulation of facts, the exhibits, and hearing argument on the points of law involved.
H. The stipulation of facts, which forms the basis of the complaint, is as follows:
“…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Company of New York, and Third-Party v. Charles S. Smith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. WinnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Central Bank of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. O'DELLCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Columbian Nat. Life Ins. v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.