Legal Opinion
O'Hanlon v. Weinbach
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), entered January 26, 1996, which, upon the granting of the respective motions of the defendants Judie Weinbach and Pololo Con Corp. d/b/a Mainstreams Bar & Restaurant Corp. for judgment as a matter of law made at the close of the plaintiffs’ case, is in favor of those defendants and against him dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Rosales v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Noto v. Mermaid RestaurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Mackain v. PrattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Xenakis v. VorilasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Capobianco v. MariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Palazzo v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Ribacoff v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Charlip v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998